UNITED NATIONS: Western powers pushed forward Tuesday with a UN resolution threatening sanctions against Syria despite Russia’s veto threat, with President Barack Obama sharply criticizing Moscow’s opposition to a measure to help millions in desperate need of humanitarian aid.
The resolution, which expresses the Security Council’s intention to impose sanctions if the Syrian government does not allow unrestricted aid deliveries to civilians caught in the fighting, was circulated among the 15 council members. Western countries made clear they had no intention of dropping the proposal despite Russia’s vow to block it a day earlier.
Obama, speaking at a joint news conference in Washington with French President Francois Hollande, said there is “great unanimity among most of the Security Council” in favor of the resolution and “Russia is a holdout.”
Obama said Secretary of State John Kerry and others have “delivered a very direct message” pressuring the Russians to drop their opposition. He said “it is not just the Syrians that are responsible” for the plight of civilians but “the Russians, as well, if they are blocking this kind of resolution.”
Hollande made clear France was determined to move forward with the resolution.
“How you can object to humanitarian corridors? Why would you prevent the vote of a resolution if, in good faith, it is all about saving human lives?” he said.
In Moscow, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the text is a “one-sided” effort to blame the Syrian government, which Moscow supports, for holding up aid.
Still, Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin attended a Security Council meeting Tuesday to discuss the text and told reporters later that it was “a good exchange of the challenges of the humanitarian situation in Syria.”
A day earlier, both Churkin and China’s ambassador were no-shows at a meeting with supporters of the draft resolution, and the Russian ambassador made clear his country would veto it if it were put to a vote. China sent its deputy ambassador to Tuesday’s meeting.
Russia and China have blocked three previous Western-backed resolutions that would have pressured President Bashar Assad to end the now three-year-old civil war.
The divided Security Council did come together in October to approve a presidential statement appealing for immediate access to all areas of Syria to deliver aid. Western and Arab countries want to go a step further with a legally binding resolution.
Pressure mounted on Russia and China to consider the proposal, with UN spokesman Martin Nesirky saying Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and UN humanitarian chief Valerie Amos support the measure. Nesirky, however, said it was up to the Security Council to decide.
France’s UN Ambassador, Gerard Araud, said the text — which calls for pauses to allow humanitarian access and an end to sieges — is “very simple, not political. It’s balanced. There is no reason to oppose it.”
“We are facing the worst humanitarian tragedy since the genocide in Rwanda in 1994,” Araud said. “Starvation is used as a weapon by the regime, and the regime is bombing in an indiscriminate way the city of Aleppo.”
“I think we should move quickly,” he added.
___
Associated Press writer Alexandra Olson contributed to this story from New York
The resolution, which expresses the Security Council’s intention to impose sanctions if the Syrian government does not allow unrestricted aid deliveries to civilians caught in the fighting, was circulated among the 15 council members. Western countries made clear they had no intention of dropping the proposal despite Russia’s vow to block it a day earlier.
Obama, speaking at a joint news conference in Washington with French President Francois Hollande, said there is “great unanimity among most of the Security Council” in favor of the resolution and “Russia is a holdout.”
Obama said Secretary of State John Kerry and others have “delivered a very direct message” pressuring the Russians to drop their opposition. He said “it is not just the Syrians that are responsible” for the plight of civilians but “the Russians, as well, if they are blocking this kind of resolution.”
Hollande made clear France was determined to move forward with the resolution.
“How you can object to humanitarian corridors? Why would you prevent the vote of a resolution if, in good faith, it is all about saving human lives?” he said.
In Moscow, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the text is a “one-sided” effort to blame the Syrian government, which Moscow supports, for holding up aid.
Still, Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin attended a Security Council meeting Tuesday to discuss the text and told reporters later that it was “a good exchange of the challenges of the humanitarian situation in Syria.”
A day earlier, both Churkin and China’s ambassador were no-shows at a meeting with supporters of the draft resolution, and the Russian ambassador made clear his country would veto it if it were put to a vote. China sent its deputy ambassador to Tuesday’s meeting.
Russia and China have blocked three previous Western-backed resolutions that would have pressured President Bashar Assad to end the now three-year-old civil war.
The divided Security Council did come together in October to approve a presidential statement appealing for immediate access to all areas of Syria to deliver aid. Western and Arab countries want to go a step further with a legally binding resolution.
Pressure mounted on Russia and China to consider the proposal, with UN spokesman Martin Nesirky saying Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and UN humanitarian chief Valerie Amos support the measure. Nesirky, however, said it was up to the Security Council to decide.
France’s UN Ambassador, Gerard Araud, said the text — which calls for pauses to allow humanitarian access and an end to sieges — is “very simple, not political. It’s balanced. There is no reason to oppose it.”
“We are facing the worst humanitarian tragedy since the genocide in Rwanda in 1994,” Araud said. “Starvation is used as a weapon by the regime, and the regime is bombing in an indiscriminate way the city of Aleppo.”
“I think we should move quickly,” he added.
___
Associated Press writer Alexandra Olson contributed to this story from New York
Faisala
ReplyDelete• 2 days ago
Very surprised at the change of heart by United Nations and western governments on the plight of women and children in Syria. Were you not the same saviours that caused the deaths of millions of children by implementing sanctions against Iraq to get even with Saddam Hussein ? Did you not bomb Iraq to smithereens And use cluster bombs? You were nothing but "Angels of Death" then but today you want us to believe that you are the "Saints" of the world. HIPPOCRYTES......
Joe from the U.S
ReplyDelete• 3 days ago
− I believe Russia is " Stone walling " and the U.S wants this Syria war to end ,but Russia keeps getting in the way ! ( Too many women and children are dying ) it needs to end !
heartless World
ReplyDelete• 4 days ago
We know how you people have saved human lives in Iraq, Afghanistan,Vietnam etc etc..
Please stop interfering in other countries issue Mr.Nato
And " Killing " in the Name of God or Cutting heads off or Arms ( Like Saddam Hussein did ) is ok ?
ReplyDeleteLets ask my " Friends " from Iraq that I have known for 30 years ( That live here in the U.S )?